About BackflowCore.ai

Built for utility backflow operations.

BackflowCore.ai exists because too many cross-connection control programs still depend on fragmented records, emailed forms, manual notice tracking, and one or two people carrying too much of the process in their heads.

BackflowCore.ai registry and inventory workspace
What problem we are solving

Backflow program administration is operational work, not just record storage.

A serious program has to manage the assembly itself, the property it protects, the tester performing the work, the submission trail, the review decision, the notice history, and the current compliance posture. When that chain is split across spreadsheets, inboxes, and side lists, the program gets harder to manage and harder to defend.

Fragmented records

Assembly, property, due-date, and test history often live in different places instead of one current record set.

Tester coordination

Utilities need a structured way to handle tester onboarding, credential evidence, and calibration readiness.

Notice follow-up

Overdue, failed, and unresolved work can disappear into side lists when communication history is not visible.

Manager visibility

Leadership needs a current view of compliance, backlog, and open risk without waiting for manual rollups.

What BackflowCore.ai is built to manage

Specific to utility workflows, not generic software.

The product language and workflow model are grounded in utility backflow operations: assembly-level records, tester readiness, digital submissions, compliance tracking, notice history, dashboards, and map-backed visibility.

  • Assembly-first records that preserve compliance history even when a physical device is swapped or rebuilt.
  • Tester workflows that account for certification evidence, calibration validity, and submission readiness.
  • Compliance tracking that distinguishes due soon, in grace, overdue, and unresolved conditions.
  • Program reporting built around live records rather than retrospective cleanup.
Built for

Utilities, municipalities, CCC managers, testers, and partners

The goal is a stronger operating system for everyone touching the program, from the utility running it to the certified tester submitting results.

Why it feels credible

Supported by broader AssetCore software foundations

BackflowCore.ai is being built on top of broader AssetCore platform patterns for tenant-scoped data, auditable file handling, scheduled workflows, and role-based access.

Stage

Early, but intentionally grounded

We do not pretend to have customer proof we do not have. Credibility comes from workflow specificity, product realism, process maturity, and closer collaboration with early partners.

Why a modern system now

This category needs more than a form layer and a reminder list.

Utilities need a system that can keep registry accuracy, tester readiness, submissions, review decisions, notices, dashboards, and exports connected. That is the difference between software that stores activity and software that helps run the program.

What utilities need
  • One operating record Registry, tester, submission, and compliance activity should stay tied together.
  • Utility control with scoped participation Testers and partners need access without weakening internal control.
  • Export-ready records Managers need auditable program data, not manual reconstruction at reporting time.
Founding utility / design partner

Interested in helping shape the product?

The Founding Utility Program is for teams that want direct access during rollout, tighter implementation feedback loops, and a stronger voice in how the product evolves around real CCC operations.

What we value
  • Operational honesty Clear discussion of current workflow pain, policy constraints, and where the process needs to be stronger.
  • Practical collaboration Feedback grounded in registry, tester, notice, and reporting work rather than abstract wish lists.
  • Early implementation insight A closer look at how rollout should support real utility teams.